{"id":3268,"date":"2017-01-05T22:49:04","date_gmt":"2017-01-06T05:49:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/?p=3268"},"modified":"2017-01-05T22:49:04","modified_gmt":"2017-01-06T05:49:04","slug":"overloads","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/person\/overloads","title":{"rendered":"Overloads"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve probably already talked about this, but I think one of the reasons that discussions about politics and religion often end in arguments is that English is not a good language for talking about such things.<\/p>\n<p>It has some basic flaws &#8211; the biggest one, by far, is the overloads, Not as big, but also frustrating, is that there&#8217;s no great way to speak of relative certainty of a statement of truth without adding a lot of words.<\/p>\n<p>The overloads thing is a serious problem. There are many, many neural symbols that map the word &#8216;God&#8217;, for example, and many, many that map the word &#8216;Love&#8217;. So the statement &#8216;God is Love&#8217; can map out all sorts of ways in different people&#8217;s minds as far as what the actual meaning, in neural symbols &#8211; ultimately the most real post-linguistic definition you can have &#8211; in different minds. And ultimately, as my friend Tory reminded me repeatedly, you can end up with semantic arguments &#8211; which waste a lot of energy and do not move the ball down the field.<\/p>\n<p>For those of you who are not programmers, a overload is when one function call can execute more than one set of code. In programming languages, overloads are type constrained &#8211; that is, you can only have one overload for String Foo(String Bar) &#8211; you could have a String Foo(Int Bar), but not a second String Foo(String Bar). English has no such constraints, nor does it have any easy way short of a lot of discussion &#8211; such as I often have with $future-person[0] &#8211; about *which* exact meaning for Love and God you have &#8211; to nail down exactly what is meant by what. Linguistically, overloads are just asking for trouble.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve probably already talked about this, but I think one of the reasons that discussions about politics and religion often end in arguments is that English is not a good language for talking about such things. It has some basic flaws &#8211; the biggest one, by far, is the overloads, Not as big, but also [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[15,16],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3268"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3268"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3268\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3269,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3268\/revisions\/3269"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}