{"id":2581,"date":"2015-05-31T02:08:32","date_gmt":"2015-05-31T09:08:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/?p=2581"},"modified":"2016-01-30T14:50:06","modified_gmt":"2016-01-30T21:50:06","slug":"more-economic-thoughts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/resource-allocation-systems\/more-economic-thoughts","title":{"rendered":"More economic thoughts"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>So, more and more I am liking the idea of a bucketed currency.<\/p>\n<p>One of the big reasons why is that politicians (especially right wingers, but politicians in general) like to talk about how they &#8216;can&#8217;t afford to do things&#8217;. One big reason for this is that our current rather broken, not to mention stupid economic system doesn&#8217;t actually keep track of the resources we have at all. Therefore, when we, for example, say that we &#8220;can&#8217;t afford&#8221; national healthcare, the truth is, we don&#8217;t even know how much it would cost! Everything gets squashed into a floating point value we call &#8220;money&#8221;, and the &#8220;money&#8221; to real resource conversion is arbitrary and generally driven by things like scarcity. It&#8217;s not a value that indicates the real value of the resource, or else fracking would never have gotten off the ground. (Any 3 year old can tell you water is more valuable than any petrochemical).<\/p>\n<p>I know that it would be a major endeavor to create a bucketed currency system. I&#8217;m talking about having separate buckets to track skilled man hours in every major skill, every type of metal, energy, transit cost, etc. I&#8217;m talking about tracking a hundred thousand buckets on every product. This is something that is well within the technology we use today, but it&#8217;s a rather radical shift from the &#8220;We turn everything into one price and call it money&#8221; system that we currently use. <\/p>\n<p>However, the only way you know if you can afford national healthcare, for example, is if you know how many man-hours you have of people skilled in the medical arts, and about how many people are going to need those skills. This is again kindergarden stuff, but it&#8217;s not something that seems to be widely acknowledged.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But, with a bucketed currency system, how would we know what people could afford?&#8221;. That&#8217;s a very good question, and not one I have a great answer for yet. However, well written software could at the very least ensure that everyone had a place to live and food to eat. Yes, I&#8217;m talking about communism. I think communism could have worked if they&#8217;d had better tools to use when they were creating it.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, then the next question is, why would *I* want this? I&#8217;m in the top 2% of my industry, skill wise, and I get paid very well because of it. On the other paw, I feel awful every time another friend tells me about being evicted, or about struggling to pay their medical bills. As near as I can tell, almost everyone out there is hurting. Even the 1% &#8211; at the point at which they become the 1%, they no longer have any idea who they can trust &#8211; who is really their friend, and who is just out for their money. You will note that I will not sign up to *BE* the 1%. I&#8217;m fairly sure if it was a goal of mine, I could do it. It&#8217;s not. But while I see us having made amazing strides in technology, I see a world where a whole lot of people are stressed, scared, and unhappy, be they at the bottom of the ladder or the top. And I&#8217;d really, really like us to find ways to fix that. I think that a &#8216;everybody eats&#8217; policy would go a long way towards that, and I think that it&#8217;s very doable. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So, more and more I am liking the idea of a bucketed currency. One of the big reasons why is that politicians (especially right wingers, but politicians in general) like to talk about how they &#8216;can&#8217;t afford to do things&#8217;. One big reason for this is that our current rather broken, not to mention stupid [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2581"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2581"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2581\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2582,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2581\/revisions\/2582"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2581"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2581"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sheer.us\/weblogs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2581"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}